← Home
The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway · July 16, 2026 · 1h 2m

The New Playbook for Resisting Authoritarianism — with Julia Angwin & Ami Fields-Meyer

Scott Galloway interviews Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Julia Angwin and former White House senior advisor Ami Fields-Meyer about their new book, On Courage. They examine how modern authoritarianism advances gradually through institutional erosion rather than dramatic coups, explore the role of Big Tech and anonymous speech in democratic resistance, and argue that small acts of individual courage matter more than grand gestures in defending democratic norms.

This summary was generated from show notes and public descriptions, not from a full transcript review. Details may contain inaccuracies.

Curious

Modern authoritarianism rarely announces itself through military coups; instead it erodes democratic institutions incrementally through legal mechanisms, institutional capture, and normalization of executive power.
Anonymous Speech and Platform Accountability Present Competing Democratic Interests
Anonymous speech protects dissidents but also enables harassment and disinformation; platforms face competing pressures to protect speech while preventing harm.

Highlights

Small Acts of Courage Compound Into Democratic Resilience
Individual courage — speaking up, refusing compliance, building coalitions — accumulates to create institutional resistance even when grand gestures feel futile.
Galloway's closing observation that 'it goes fast' captures the disorienting experience of watching institutional norms erode slowly until suddenly resistance becomes impossible.

Editorial

Effective resistance to authoritarianism requires building broad coalitions with people who disagree on other issues, prioritizing shared commitment to democratic process over ideological alignment.

References

On CourageJulia Angwin, Ami Fields-Meyer (2026)Central book discussed; explores authoritarianism resistance strategies

Misc

Galloway's closing: 'It goes fast' — a reminder that democratic collapse is gradual and easy to miss
Focus on ordinary people's capacity for resistance, not just institutional actors
Distinction between resistance through institutional channels vs. direct action
Was this useful?