← Home
EconTalk · August 17, 2026 · 1h 13m

The Hidden Cause of the Industrial Revolution (with Ben Southwood)

Ben Southwood of Works in Progress argues that the Glorious Revolution of the 1680s was a quiet legal revolution that unlocked British growth well before the steam engine. By shifting power to a Parliament of landowners, England began streamlining its tangled, inefficient property rights through thousands of case-by-case acts. This freed up land for investment, enabled the consolidation of fragmented farms, and sparked a boom in privately-built roads, canals, and navigable rivers that created national markets. The conversation explores how these centuries-old lessons about buying off holdouts could inform solutions to today's housing and infrastructure gridlock.

This summary was generated from show notes and public descriptions, not from a full transcript review. Details may contain inaccuracies.

Canon

•
Parliament used case-by-case acts and eminent domain to buy off holdouts and consolidate fragmented farmland, a model for resolving current gridlock.

Curious

•
Southwood argues today's housing and infrastructure crises can be solved by the same principle: buying off veto-players who currently block development.

Highlights

•
The Glorious Revolution as a Property Rights Revolution
The Glorious Revolution of the 1680s shifted Parliament's incentives to rationalize tangled property rights, sparking a wave of private infrastructure investment.
•
Private Road, Canal, and River Navigation Boom
After the property rights overhaul, a massive wave of private investment in roads, canals, and navigable rivers created Britain's first national market.

Editorial

•
Pre-Improvement Travel Speed: 1.5 Miles Per Hour
Before the property reforms, the typical speed of road travel in England was only 1.5 miles per hour, severely limiting economic integration.

Misc

✧Roads once moved at only 1.5 miles per hour before the improvements.
✧The Glorious Revolution empowered a Parliament composed largely of landowners who simplified their own property rights.
Was this useful?