← Home
EconTalk · June 22, 2026 · 1h 19m

Can a Phone Be a Cow? (with Philip Auerswald)

Philip Auerswald of George Mason University talks with EconTalk host Russ Roberts about how the mobile phone reached traditionally excluded populations and transformed productivity. They discuss the story of a small group of entrepreneurs in 1990s Bangladesh who saw a phone as a shareable asset—like a cow—that could generate income for villagers. The conversation also covers William Nordhaus's use of the cost of illumination as a metric of human progress, Joseph Schumpeter's idea of innovation as novel combinations, and the question of how much of progress is inevitable versus dependent on determined individuals.

This summary was generated from show notes and public descriptions, not from a full transcript review. Details may contain inaccuracies.

Canon

Schumpeter's idea that innovation arises from combining existing elements in novel ways explains the phone-as-cow story.

Curious

Nordhaus's Cost of Illumination as a Metric of Progress
William Nordhaus's research demonstrates that the cost of light has fallen by orders of magnitude over centuries, revealing progress that standard economic measures miss.

Highlights

In 1990s Bangladesh, entrepreneurs recognized that a mobile phone could be shared and rented to others, functioning as a productive asset much like a cow.
The Role of Little-Known Entrepreneurs
Figures like Iqbal Quadir in Bangladesh and foundational innovator Claude Shannon were critical in extending mobile connectivity to billions.

Editorial

Inevitability vs. Individual Agency in Human Progress
Auerswald asks how much of human progress is determined by broad historical forces and how much hinges on the decisions of remarkable individuals.

Misc

The central anecdote: In 1990s Bangladesh, a mobile phone could be rented out to neighbors, functioning like a cow as a productive asset for poor households.
The conversation frames the spread of mobile connectivity as perhaps the greatest technological revolution in human history.
Was this useful?