← Home
Afford Anything · June 16, 2026 · 58m

Why Does Every Good Idea Die in a Meeting? – with HBS Prof Linda Hill and Jason Wild

Harvard Business School professor Linda Hill and innovation consultant Jason Wild discuss how organizations can truly innovate. They outline three essential leadership roles: Architect, Bridger, and Catalyst, and explain why co-creation beats consensus. They introduce the concept of creative abrasion — debating ideas rather than avoiding conflict — and offer tactics for driving change from within. They also highlight that in an AI-driven world, building trust and relationships remains uniquely human.

This summary was generated from show notes and public descriptions, not from a full transcript review. Details may contain inaccuracies.

Curious

Creative Abrasion
Creative abrasion is the practice of rubbing ideas against each other through rigorous debate and discourse, rather than smoothing over disagreements to maintain surface harmony.

Novel

Three Leadership Roles for Innovation: Architect, Bridger, Catalyst
Linda Hill and Jason Wild identify three key roles that drive organizational innovation: the Architect builds a culture of risk-taking, the Bridger connects departments and outside partners, and the Catalyst builds coalitions across ecosystems.

Highlights

Co-Creation vs. Consensus
Linda Hill argues that co-creation—building ideas together through iterative collaboration—produces far better outcomes than consensus-seeking, which often waters down ideas to the lowest common denominator.
AI's Weak Spot: Building Trust in Low-Trust Environments
Both guests agree that the ability to build trust and relationships in low-trust environments is one of the hardest skills for AI to replicate, making it a key competitive advantage for human knowledge workers.

Editorial

Building Coalitions from the Middle
For individuals stuck in slow, tradition-bound organizations, the most effective change strategy is to find people who share your interests, build a coalition, and work your way up organically—rather than trying to persuade the most powerful person first.

Misc

Linda Hill referred to the Bridger role as the 'revenge of middle management'.
Was this useful?